From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31695 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2008 19:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31685 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2008 19:22:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:22:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE0310CD7; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:22:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DCF1053B; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:22:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L9lgJ-0004m1-TR; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:22:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gingold@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin: single step through sigreturn Message-ID: <20081208192211.GA18333@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , brobecker@adacore.com, gingold@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200812042228.mB4MSIcl009759@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <75F20677-9F36-4769-AB34-7D3D41BF5E94@adacore.com> <20081208174805.GF3823@adacore.com> <200812081813.mB8IDKrf016619@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812081813.mB8IDKrf016619@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 07:13:20PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:48:05 +0100 > > From: Joel Brobecker > > > > > Argh, copy and cut issues. Is it ok to attach the patches ? > > > > Absolutely! > > Not really. Some MIME implementations do horrible things to diffs. > > I'm probably fighting a losing battle here, but the preferred way to > send diffs is inline, using a sane mail client that doesn't add any > formatting of its own. Unfortunately, it's against the mail clients that we're losing the battle... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery