From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19349 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2008 22:42:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 19330 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2008 22:42:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:42:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 11089 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2008 22:42:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Dec 2008 22:42:07 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFA] dummy frame handling cleanup, plus inferior fun call signal handling improvement Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200812041531.mB4FVEKt030233@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812042242.53482.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On Thursday 04 December 2008 22:32:12, Doug Evans wrote: > In the original code, is there a case when stop_pc != registers.pc? Here, (gdb) set $pc = 0xf00 (gdb) call func() But here it isn't (!=): (gdb) set $pc = 0xf00 (gdb) thread 2 (gdb) thread 1 (gdb) call func() Don't you love globals? :-) I bet that if we got rid of stop_pc most people wouldn't notice a difference. -- Pedro Alves