From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60396-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2421 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2008 00:04:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 1950 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2008 00:04:14 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:03:13 +0000
Received: (qmail 6381 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2008 00:03:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Dec 2008 00:03:11 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Patch to support spaces in filenames & paths
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:04:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,  Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,  Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
References: <7D653316E38B4305941199D722BF20B0@bibi> <4935A5E2.5050503@vmware.com> <20081202233738.GA15530@caradoc.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081202233738.GA15530@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200812030003.48011.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2

On Tuesday 02 December 2008 23:37:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:17:22PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > Denis, is it possible that Jon's patch will serve in place of
> > the filename portion of your patch?  And that you could then
> > resubmit your patch with just the other portions?
> >
> > Jon's patch:
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-12/msg00032.html
> >
> > Denis' patch:
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-12/msg00029.html
> 
> I have not looked at the patches in depth but I encourage Denis's
> approach - uniform parsing is a Very Good Thing and buildargv is what
> we use elsewhere.

Same here, but I think it should be using the new gdb_buildargv.

-- 
Pedro Alves