From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9844 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2008 17:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9816 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2008 17:25:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.intrepid.com (HELO mail.intrepid.com) (74.95.8.113) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:25:14 +0000 Received: from screamer.local (screamer.local [10.10.1.2]) by mail.intrepid.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAQHNZL5010871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:23:35 -0800 Received: from screamer.local (screamer.local [127.0.0.1]) by screamer.local (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAQHNZXa003713; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:23:35 -0800 Received: (from gary@localhost) by screamer.local (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id mAQHNWXm003712; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:23:32 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:01:00 -0000 From: Gary Funck To: Vinay Sridhar Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz , luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch] Accessing tls variables across files causes a bug Message-ID: <20081126172332.GE19317@intrepid.com> References: <1221019993.4923.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1221019993.4923.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 On 09/10/08 09:43:13, Vinay Sridhar wrote: > Any idea when the below changes are likely to go in? Recently, we've run into a situation where we need this bug fix. I've corresponded with Jan on this, and he mentioned that the fix may have some unknown impact or regressions on the main line (though none that he knows of), and that this patch is pending review, before it can be committed. Have the GDB maintainers had a chance to review this patch? Is there anything that I can do to help move it along? thanks, - Gary