From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ia64: Fix breakpoints memory shadow
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081122181525.GG4318@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uy6zchubn.fsf@gnu.org>
> > + instr_breakpoint = slotN_contents (bundle_mem, slotnum);
> > + if (instr_breakpoint != IA64_BREAKPOINT)
> > + warning (_("Breakpoint removal cannot find the placed breakpoint at %s"),
> > + paddr_nz (bp_tgt->placed_address));
>
> Can this happen as part of normal GDB behavior? If not, we should
> make this internal_error, I think. If indeed this is a warning, we
> should tell users what to do with such a warning, either as part of
> the message or at least in the manual.
Maybe we can imagine some far-fetched scenario where the user is in
non-stop mode, meaning that the breakpoints are always inserted, and
that the user somehow overwrites the breakpoint instruction manually
before switching back to all-stop (is that even possible?). In that
case, that would be a valid warning.
Regardless of that, I thought that the warning was a judicious choice
because the debugger might be able to recover from this situation.
Whether or not there was a breakpoint there, it can still restore
the instruction at that address and hopefully continue working normally.
Changing the warning into an internal_error would cause the debugger
to abruptly abort the current operation (after which the user might
choose to end the debugging session). I thought that attempting to
recover would bring more benefit in this case.
I would agree that some extra documentation explaining this warning
might be useful. That being said, I'm not opposed to changing the
warning into an internal_error, if you still think it's better.
> > + if (slotnum > 2)
> > + error (_("Can't insert breakpoint for slot numbers greater than 2."));
>
> Similarly here: assuming slot numbers are not something exposed to the
> user, I'd be bewildered if presented with such a message. If this is
> an internal GDB error (a.k.a. bug), let's treat it like one.
In this case, the invalid address can occur as a result of bad user input:
(top-gdb) b *0x4000000000054c73
Breakpoint 4 at 0x4000000000054c73: file gdb.c, line 28.
(top-gdb) c
Continuing.
Can't insert breakpoint for slot numbers greater than 2.
So this is not necessarily an internal error.
I wish GDB would catch the invalid address a little earlier, though.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 17:52 Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-30 1:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-31 0:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-11-01 18:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-11 20:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-11-13 14:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-21 1:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-11-22 18:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-22 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-24 2:25 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-11-24 7:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-11-25 17:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-27 0:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081122181525.GG4318@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox