From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16690 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 04:22:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16634 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 04:22:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:21:57 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556C510A09; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:21:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF7110599; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:21:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L313B-0001rM-9L; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:21:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Michael Snyder , teawater , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10 Message-ID: <20081120042153.GA6871@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Michael Snyder , teawater , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <4924C246.6030104@vmware.com> <1227153607.28256.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1227153607.28256.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:00:07AM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > I'm fine with leaving 2 to be investigated/addressed when record adds > support for its 2nd arch. It also may prove impractical, since there may > be slight differences in syscalls for each arch. Correct - there are slight differences, e.g. on LP64 platforms, and especially in the layout of things like 'struct stat' - I don't know if that's relevant here. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery