From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29487 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 02:15:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29371 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 02:15:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:14:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 11005 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2008 02:14:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 20 Nov 2008 02:14:34 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Michael Snyder Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 6/10 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , teawater References: <200811200202.26043.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4924C6D5.5020903@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4924C6D5.5020903@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811200214.37330.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 On Thursday 20 November 2008 02:09:25, Michael Snyder wrote: > I do share your knee jerk reaction... > > Maybe I "let the cat out of the bag", because it appears > that the intended meaning of the macro was "are we recording", > but the implementation is "is this the process_record target". I already felt like this before regarding the RECORD_IS_USED macro, so it was not about the name change. Not sure if it's "are we recording" or are we "replaying", or a mix of both. In any case, could each call site on the common code be replaced by a new suitable target method/property? -- Pedro Alves