From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59965-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29254 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 17:18:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 29096 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2008 17:18:17 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:17:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 11037 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2008 17:17:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 14 Nov 2008 17:17:40 -0000
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Notification for attach/detach.
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:19:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.10.90 (Linux/2.6.24-21-generic; KDE/4.1.73; i686; svn-883826; 2008-11-13)
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <200811122335.01950.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20081113232313.GQ5112@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081113232313.GQ5112@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200811142017.33517.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2

On Friday 14 November 2008 02:23:13 Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > index f76bf9f..cc0eb06 100644
> > --- a/gdb/doc/observer.texi
> > +++ b/gdb/doc/observer.texi
> > @@ -187,3 +187,13 @@ a pointer to the new architecture.
> >  The thread's ptid has changed.  The @var{old_ptid} parameter specifies
> >  the old value, and @var{new_ptid} specifies the new value.
> >  @end deftypefun
> > +
> > +@deftypefun void new_inferior (int @var{pid})
> > +@value{GDBN} has attached to a new inferior identified by @var{pid}.
> > +@end deftypefun
> > +
> > +@deftypefun void inferior_exit (int @var{pid})
> > +The inferior identified by @var{pid} has either exited, or was detached
> > +from.
> > +@end deftypefun
> > +
>
> This part should be reviewed by Eli. The documentation for the first
> observer looks fine to me, but I find the second one a little awkward.
> Perhaps Eli will have another one of his good suggestions. In the
> meantime, perhaps the following would do:
>
>   The inferior identified by @var{pid} has exited, or @value{GDBN}
>   detached from it.

Eli,
can you comment?

Thanks,
Volodya