From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19393 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 18:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 19369 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2008 18:14:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:14:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 11193 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2008 18:14:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 14 Nov 2008 18:14:10 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Stan Shebs Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v4 - part 0/4) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Tristan Gingold , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <47B0F703-D6C4-4C50-A80C-16DB445DA7CE@adacore.com> <491DB997.9090002@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <491DB997.9090002@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811141814.24360.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Friday 14 November 2008 17:47:03, Stan Shebs wrote: > Tristan Gingold wrote: > > > > On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > >> On Friday 14 November 2008 16:26:23, Tristan Gingold wrote: > >>> + @table @code > >>> + @item set debug inferior @var{num} > >>> + @kindex set debug inferior > >>> + When set to a non zero value, enables debugging messages specific to > >>> + the Darwin support. The bigger the value is the more verbose the > >>> output is. > >> > >> Please don't use "inferior" for darwin specific things. It is a very > >> general term, and collides with what we may want to do with the > >> common gdb/inferior.c module. > > > > Ok, will change to "maint darwin-debug" > > > We have "set debug" that is generally available; some of the options are > clearly maintenance-only, such as "set debug infrun", so that seems a > convenient place for a Darwin-specific flag. (We could add "maint set > debug", but that seems a little too pedantic :-) .) I'm OK with "set debug", just not "set debug inferior". "set debug darwin" would also be fine with me. -- Pedro Alves