Re: [PATCH 3/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- XML support part

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-04T22:36:28Z

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:25:33AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Does this mean we can be sure no new syscalls will be added to the
> list, ever?

Syscalls are continually added to the list. But you don't need to
know which ones are present on the current system - just to keep the
files up to date in current versions of GDB. Unknown syscalls should
be displayed by number but otherwise handled just like known ones,
I think.

(General goal, not a statement on the patch; I haven't looked.)

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery