From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59764-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23405 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2008 19:06:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 23334 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2008 19:06:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:06:12 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mA8J65Za004232; 	Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:06:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mA8J63dh032132; 	Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:06:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200811081906.mA8J63dh032132@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <1225811131.32321.11.camel@miki> (message from 	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= on Tue, 04 	Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0200)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- XML support part
References: <1225773086.24532.55.camel@miki> 	 <200811041335.mA4DZtYH016463@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1225811131.32321.11.camel@miki>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2

> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0200
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:35 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, I haven't looked at the code yes, but this is all Linux-specific
> > stuff, so this should be reflected in the names of those files.
> 
> I think Daniel asked me to do the same thing, so I'll consider this
> problem solved, ok?

Yup.