From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "Dr. Rolf Jansen" <rj@surtec.com>
Subject: Re: Issue with gdbserver --multi / remote-extended on Windows XP
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811050103.23123.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E9B56D18-AB65-4F0A-A491-AF6C47A731AD@surtec.com>
Hi,
I don't think anyone responded to this.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 18:35:15, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
> I experimented a little bit with gdbserver --multi in remote-xtended
> mode on Windows XP and I had one major problem in debugging a gui
> application. If I regularly quit the gui app, to which gdbserver is
> attached, its open windows remain at the screen, and while although
> inresponsive they are still part of the window hierarchy of Windows.
>
>
> Observations:
> - the gui app is terminates itself by calling exit(0).
> - if I quit gdbserver, the open zombie-windows disappear
> - in non-multi/remote-extended-mode gdbserver this problem
> does not appear, because gdbserver terminates itself
> together with the application
>
>
> I found a solution that works for me, although, there might be better
> ways.
>
> At line 1456 of win32-low.c I added:
>
> TerminateProcess (current_process_handle,
> current_event.u.ExitProcess.dwExitCode);
> child_continue (DBG_TERMINATE_PROCESS, -1);
>
>
>
> This code is added in event-handler switch() of
> get_child_debug_event() and the respective case block looks now like:
>
> case EXIT_PROCESS_DEBUG_EVENT:
> OUTMSG2 (("gdbserver: kernel event EXIT_PROCESS_DEBUG_EVENT "
> "for pid=%d tid=%x\n",
> (unsigned) current_event.dwProcessId,
> (unsigned) current_event.dwThreadId));
> ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_EXITED;
> ourstatus->value.integer =
> current_event.u.ExitProcess.dwExitCode;
> TerminateProcess (current_process_handle,
> current_event.u.ExitProcess.dwExitCode);
> child_continue (DBG_TERMINATE_PROCESS, -1);
Hmm, I haven't tried this, but, are you sure you need to
terminate the process like this? Wouldn't a
child_continue (DBG_CONTINUE, -1) work here? It's what
native gdb does (it's in win32_mourn_inferior).
I can't find it now, but I'm almost sure that's documented somewhere
as required for the debugger to do (I scratched my head once at why
was win32_mourn_inferior telling the dead process to continue, and found
that out). Well, I could be wrong though.
> CloseHandle (current_process_handle);
> current_process_handle = NULL;
> break;
>
>
> With these changes in place, regular gui app termination works well
> with gdbserver --multi/remote-extended on Windows XP.
>
> Best regards
>
> Rolf
>
>
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-17 17:36 Dr. Rolf Jansen
2008-11-05 1:04 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-01-13 17:00 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-01-13 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-01-13 18:22 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811050103.23123.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=rj@surtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox