From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4754 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 15:50:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 4717 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2008 15:50:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:49:50 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7400310CE5; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7410C35; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxOA7-0004A9-U1; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:49:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= Cc: Phil Muldoon , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Build system, documentation and testcase Message-ID: <20081104154947.GA15985@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= , Phil Muldoon , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1225773088.24532.56.camel@miki> <49100551.6010000@redhat.com> <1225810920.32321.5.camel@miki> <20081104151447.GB32619@caradoc.them.org> <1225812925.32321.19.camel@miki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1225812925.32321.19.camel@miki> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:35:24PM -0200, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:14 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > It shouldn't be too hard for someone to add it later. So restricting > > the tests to native targets would be enough. Search for > > [is_remote target] in the testsuite. > > I don't know if I'm doing this correctly, but I already use [is_remote > target] in the testcase. If this test returns true, I simply do a > "continue", which (I think) skips this test and goes to the next one. If > that's not correct, then I should fix it :-). In that case, you're covered. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery