From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19695 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 13:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 19636 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2008 13:47:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:47:13 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD4A10813; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB5E104E2; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxMFR-0002nD-1s; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:47:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- XML support part Message-ID: <20081104134708.GA10644@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1225773086.24532.55.camel@miki> <200811041335.mA4DZtYH016463@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811041335.mA4DZtYH016463@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:35:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Hmm, I haven't looked at the code yes, but this is all Linux-specific > stuff, so this should be reflected in the names of those files. Yes please. We should be able to do non-Linux syscalls too, but they'll require different data files. Sergio, while you're moving them, could they go in a subdirectory please? Maybe gdb/syscalls/ ? It doesn't need to have a separate ChangeLog or Makefile or anything like that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery