Re: [PATCH 3/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- XML support part

Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-05T01:02:59Z

On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 17:35 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:25:33AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Does this mean we can be sure no new syscalls will be added to the
> > list, ever?
>
> Syscalls are continually added to the list. But you don't need to
> know which ones are present on the current system - just to keep the
> files up to date in current versions of GDB. Unknown syscalls should
> be displayed by number but otherwise handled just like known ones,
> I think.
>
> (General goal, not a statement on the patch; I haven't looked.)

That's what the patch does, as far as I have tested. I may have missed
something, of course.

--
SÃ©rgio Durigan JÃºnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil