From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2008 15:13:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 8466 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2008 15:13:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:13:05 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC1010C2C; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:13:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A5310811; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:13:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx170-00086h-8P; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:13:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Share the shared library list between inferiors Message-ID: <20081103151302.GA31147@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200810272329.04758.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20081103142920.GA28482@caradoc.them.org> <200811031504.38355.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811031504.38355.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:04:38PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Certainly! Sorry about that. That came from the fact that feature > implementation having had several dressings over time, and I guess > I had just started seeing through the name. > > I could also rename the gdbarch method to something like > gdbarch_code_is_shared_between_processes, if you'd like (although > it sounds a bit long of a name). I think the name is fine - if we need some day to separate these features, then we'll create extra gdbarch knobs for them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery