Re: [RFC] Share the shared library list between inferiors

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-03T15:13:47Z

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:04:38PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Certainly! Sorry about that. That came from the fact that feature
> implementation having had several dressings over time, and I guess
> I had just started seeing through the name.
>
> I could also rename the gdbarch method to something like
> gdbarch_code_is_shared_between_processes, if you'd like (although
> it sounds a bit long of a name).

I think the name is fine - if we need some day to separate these
features, then we'll create extra gdbarch knobs for them.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery