Re: [RFC] Share the shared library list between inferiors

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-03T14:30:08Z

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:29:04PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> There are several ways to skin this cat. This one seemed like
> the smallest, most extensible and malleable one from GDB's side, because
> it doesn't cast to stone any new protocol extension --- which may
> prove limited to some systems (some memory regions shared, others not;
> some shared but visible at different addresses in different
> inferiors/cores, etc.). I was hoping we'd cross that bridge when
> we start seeing those systems reporting multi process support
> to GDB.
>
> What do people think about this?

I have one request. Could you expand the comment to mention the other
properties you're associating with this flag?

Global breakpoints and a single common target description don't
obviously follow from "global shared library list".

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery