From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22069 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2008 16:27:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21945 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2008 16:27:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:26:50 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9SGQgOK017082; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:26:42 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m9SGQfbl011775; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:26:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200810281626.m9SGQfbl011775@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20081028141021.GA21659@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:21 -0400) Subject: Re: PATCH: Extend gdb remote protocol for AVX References: <200810021026.m92AQMqC006955@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <6dc9ffc80810020715o21079a0fn972cd30a94695f6c@mail.gmail.com> <200810042049.m94Kn3k8015088@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20081004221325.GA6856@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc80810050737r56b0d044vcf8e8f1368d2d03d@mail.gmail.com> <200810062135.m96LZI0H016325@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <6dc9ffc80810071221r10439dd2m886637a1dc7327ab@mail.gmail.com> <200810121337.m9CDbu7Y031268@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <6dc9ffc80810121517n1581323cl21808a5f99cce13d@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80810272258m60f6d1c6w54b012ee90346b21@mail.gmail.com> <20081028141021.GA21659@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00678.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:21 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58:36PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Are there any objections to my AVX patch? > > There were objections - just read the thread you are replying to. If > you have not changed the patch, then there are still objections. I also think it would be good to seperate out the changes to GDB's internal register file from the extensions you want to make to the remote protocol. And I'd really like to see how an implementation of i387_supply_xsave() and i387_collect_xsave() would look in that context.