From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7583 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2008 01:58:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 7485 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2008 01:58:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:58:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2971310812; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:58:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34E5106D8; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:58:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KtYPl-0000OJ-6e; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:58:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: A couple of uses of xmalloc and xfree in a couple of .y files Message-ID: <20081025015805.GA1484@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200810242358.11089.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20081025001350.GC29998@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081025001350.GC29998@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 05:13:50PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Anything I'm missing preventing me from applying this as obvious? > > Yes, I think we should be consistent. > > The thing I don't get is why we don't translate free->xfree, though. I think the sed rule predates our copy of xfree. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery