From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27566 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2008 13:32:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 27552 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2008 13:32:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:32:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 19253 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 13:32:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Oct 2008 13:32:10 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Mingw gdb validation Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Denis PILAT References: <48FC4417.2030807@st.com> <20081022132606.GA9276@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20081022132606.GA9276@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810221432.14966.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 22 October 2008 14:26:06, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:40:55AM +0200, Denis PILAT wrote: > > Is there any chance for such a patch to be accepted ? > > It allows the following test to be successful when using a MinGW gdb > > (means a gdb compiled under MSYS environment or using > > CFLAGS="-mno-cygwin" under cygwin). > > That depends why it's necessary... we have been testing mingw GDB > binaries for at least a year, and I've never seen this failure. IIRC, we have a local patch that forces GDB's stdout/stderr to binary mode, thus avoiding all these \r\n issues. > Are you using a Cygwin expect binary to drive the GDB? -- Pedro Alves