From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] add struct parse_context to all command functions
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081021181739.GA10391@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810211805.m9LI5Lt0014410@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> FWIW I'd also prefer this option.
Listening to Tom talk about this I've started to wonder if it's
necessary... do we have a unified vision on where the global state
accesses are OK?
GDB is single threaded. I anticipate it will remain so. So, having
the functions which implement user interface commands read global
state doesn't seem like a big problem - unlike the expression parser.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 14:05 Joel Brobecker
2008-10-09 16:13 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-09 22:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-20 16:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-20 19:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-10-21 0:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-21 18:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-21 18:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-10-22 1:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-22 20:15 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-22 20:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-21 1:22 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-21 7:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-21 18:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-21 18:58 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-21 19:33 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-22 18:03 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-22 18:54 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-22 22:24 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-23 1:02 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-23 19:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-23 21:29 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-24 13:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-25 16:05 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-27 17:07 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-28 16:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-28 18:17 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-28 20:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-10-25 16:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-25 16:46 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-26 15:19 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-21 18:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081021181739.GA10391@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox