From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10704 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2008 02:59:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 10692 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2008 02:59:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:58:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 31399 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2008 02:58:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.104?) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Oct 2008 02:58:43 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA] Displaced stepping just enable in non-stop mode Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: teawater , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Michael Snyder References: <200810160107.42525.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20081016023837.GA32668@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20081016023837.GA32668@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810160359.09956.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 On Thursday 16 October 2008 03:38:37, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:07:42AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > I think Joel's suggestion was a good one: By gaining an "auto" > > setting, this is as much a maintainer command as > > "set breakpoint always-inserted" is. So, I believe it's time we move > > the command to the top level "set" command group. > > > > set can-use-displaced-stepping (auto|on|off) > > > > Eli, can I ask you to go over the help strings and the documentation in > > the patch below? Do they look OK-ish? > > That's a pretty long name. Do you think there are any other useful > stepping related settings? If so, maybe we should have a "set step" > prefix. > Hmm, not offhand. I'd have to think about it. What would you call the setting then, if not "set step can-use-displaced-stepping" ? The name was actually modeled on "set can-use-hw-watchpoints" in the first place. -- Pedro Alves