Re: [RFA] Resubmit, reverse debugging [0/5]

Michael Snyder
2008-10-15T18:42:51Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> We also discussed earlier the idea of a capability check,
>> or like a qSupported message. Are we going to make that a
>> requirement before this patch can go in? Or can it be added
>> as a subsequent, incremental improvement?
>
> I don't have an opinion either way.
>
>> And are there any more requirements before this patch can go in?
>
> If Pedro has no further comments - he had several before - then it
> should be fine. I don't know what "this patch" covers, though, so
> it's hard to be sure.

Pedro? Did I address your concerns, and/or are the remaining
ones addressable incrementally?