From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: type/main_type/field size [Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1]
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081008033125.GF3810@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081007232111.GA6913@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
> > I think it is kind of ugly, and i tried to think about it for a while,
> > but I don't see many possible solutions if we don't want to increase
> > the gdbtype struct size.
>
> BTW are there some measurements if sizeof (type / main_type / field)
> matters?
Once in a while, Tom will post some numbers with each of his size
improvements. He worked pretty hard at reducing the sizes by some
bytes, so I'd like to know what he thinks of the increase before
adding a pointer back (4-8 bytes).
(2MB seems like a small and reasonable increase to me)
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-15 15:06 [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays Tobias Burnus
2008-08-18 11:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-18 15:54 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-07 11:59 ` [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays] Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-08 15:32 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-08 17:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-19 22:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-26 23:04 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-27 14:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-19 6:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-22 15:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-24 19:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-26 5:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-26 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-02 22:13 ` [patch] Fortran obsolete bounds type [Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1] Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-26 12:52 ` [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays] Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-26 22:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-26 22:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-19 22:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-26 5:06 ` Accessor macro wrappers removal [Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1] Jan Kratochvil
2008-09-26 12:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-02 20:59 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-02 21:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-26 23:15 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-26 12:58 ` [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays] Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <20081006200928.GD3588@adacore.com>
2008-10-06 20:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-07 23:22 ` type/main_type/field size [Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1] Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-08 3:32 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-10-08 23:56 ` Tom Tromey
2008-10-04 20:28 ` [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays] Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-06 20:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-07 23:18 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-10-08 3:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-08 12:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081008033125.GF3810@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox