From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25113 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2008 02:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 25098 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2008 02:59:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:58:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596AC2A96D3; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:58:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fJZZNGqlDiA6; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:58:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E582A96D2; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:58:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B50CE7ACD; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:58:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Pedro Alves , teawater Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 1/5 Message-ID: <20081008025823.GD3810@adacore.com> References: <20081006212504.GB31085@caradoc.them.org> <48EA868E.3070404@vmware.com> <20081006222258.GF21853@adacore.com> <48EAB0AD.30906@vmware.com> <20081007034840.GE28138@adacore.com> <48EBAA24.2080700@vmware.com> <20081008001541.GA3810@adacore.com> <48EBFEE7.6020500@vmware.com> <20081008005424.GC3810@adacore.com> <48EC1043.1040706@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48EC1043.1040706@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > So if we remove the memory of the exec state from the target_ops > layer and transfer it to the infrun layer, then target_set_execdir > will have no semantics at all except "does this work". OK, somehow, I thought things would work differently. Thanks for breaking through my thick skull. I think that a to_can_... method would indeed be a good solution. -- Joel