Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1 [Re: [gdb] Fortran dynamic arrays]

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-26T22:20:32Z

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:14:32PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > In my opinion, we should go with Jan's patch. I don't think that
> > artificial is a discriminant; it has a clear meaning as a flag and
> > nothing to do with the location or the loc union.
>
> Agreed. Just a thought (independent from this patch): If this is
> a flag, should we try moving this flag up together with the rest
> of the flags?

Aren't the others on the type? This really is a flag on the field.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery