From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2010 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2008 04:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2002 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2008 04:24:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:23:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451902A96CF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rig6L66m03KU for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240B72A96C1 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40445E7ACD; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/Ada] Implement Ada tasking support (take 2) Message-ID: <20081007042354.GG28138@adacore.com> References: <20080924174850.GC3607@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080924174850.GC3607@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > * target.h (struct target_ops): Add new field to_get_ada_task_ptid. > (target_get_ada_task_ptid): New macro. > * target.c (default_get_ada_task_ptid): New function. > (update_current_target): Inherit field default_get_ada_task_ptid. > (update_current_target): Make default_get_ada_task_ptid the default > value for field to_get_ada_task_ptid. Just wondering if anyone had any objection to this part. Once I have this part ok'ed, the rest is Ada-specific, does not affect the rest of the code, and is pretty clean (IMHO - which doesn't mean it can't be improved). I would prefer if this part didn't linger too much; otherwise, I have to resync the patch, resend, etc. Thank you, -- Joel