Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 4/5

Joel Brobecker
2008-10-07T03:18:15Z

> There's actually another function that implements the
> reverse-finish command. This function is a helper,
> one that just does part of the job.

I think I got that part, perhaps in my attempt to save my fingers
(they REALLY hurt from too much typing right now :-(), I didn't
express what I wanted to say all that well. I hope you got the
idea.

> >>+ /* (Kludgy way of letting wait_for_inferior know...) */
> >>+ tp->step_range_start = tp->step_range_end = 1;
> >
> >AARGH! More special meaning to these addresses. We really ought to
> >clean these up and put some specific flags in the structure, one day.
> >I don't know why we're trying so hard to resume these fields.
>
> OK, in this instance, I did not add the special meaning.
> I was only following what practice was already there. ;-)

right - I was just complaining, not saying that you were responsible
nor asking you to fix it. No problemo (and thanks for bearing with
my whining ;-).

--
Joel