On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:11:19 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > +  if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_ARRAY)
> > > > +    {
> > > > +      printfi_filtered (spaces, "upper bound undefined is %d\n",
> > > > +			TYPE_ARRAY_UPPER_BOUND_IS_UNDEFINED (type));
> > > > +      printfi_filtered (spaces, "lower bound undefined is %d\n",
> > > > +			TYPE_ARRAY_LOWER_BOUND_IS_UNDEFINED (type));
> > > > +    }
...
> That's only my opinion too, and there is no real reason why my opinion
> should count too. But to me, this function does a low-level dump of
> our type structure, and thus should follow closely the implementation.
> If we start to introduce a higher-level view of this type, I think
> it can potentially be confusing.  For now, I would prefer to leave
> that part out.

Removed.


Committed.
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2008-10/msg00019.html


Thanks,
Jan