From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9540 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2008 21:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9529 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2008 21:05:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:04:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA8810D30; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 21:04:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5670B104B3; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 21:04:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlVLm-0001FA-C0; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:04:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tobias Burnus , Ulrich Weigand , Jim Blandy Subject: Re: Accessor macro wrappers removal [Re: [patch] static_kind -> bit0, bit1] Message-ID: <20081002210442.GA4557@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tobias Burnus , Ulrich Weigand , Jim Blandy References: <20080818111120.GE16894@adacore.com> <200808181553.m7IFrG3w005270@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <48A59B3C.9050801@net-b.de> <20080818111120.GE16894@adacore.com> <20080907115637.GA12939@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080919221221.GA23372@adacore.com> <20080926044309.GA3803@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080926125422.GB21287@caradoc.them.org> <20081002205722.GA12134@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081002205722.GA12134@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 10:57:22PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > "in struct type" is the difference. [list of other ways to do the same thing] But this is the one that GDB uses. If you think there's a good reason to switch, propose patches, but I don't see a point. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery