From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-58938-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24544 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2008 15:25:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 24489 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2008 15:25:48 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-72-93-245-44.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (72.93.245.44)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:12 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9DA13C027; 	Thu,  2 Oct 2008 11:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id B749D679125; Thu,  2 Oct 2008 11:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFA] fix win32-nat failure
Message-ID: <20081002152500.GA642@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 	Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
References: <005401c923c0$be5ae250$3b10a6f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <009a01c9246a$64ece5b0$2ec6b110$@u-strasbg.fr> <00b701c92485$8bc23260$a3469720$@u-strasbg.fr> <200810021401.20466.pedro@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200810021401.20466.pedro@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:01:20PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>OK.  Please check it in.

Um.  Wait a minute.  You may be a global maintainer now but as far as I
understand the process that doesn't give you carte blanche to make
changes in win32-nat.c or other parts of the code which have
maintainers.

I've been following this discussion to see the outcome and I have no
problems with the fix but I don't want you to assume that you have the
blanket right to authorize changes to win32-nat.c unless I seem to be
unresponsive for some period of time.

cgf