From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7779 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2008 14:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 7620 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2008 14:08:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:16 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A7F104AC; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560471049B; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kggdd-00089a-5J; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:07:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 02/08] multi-process support: all targets manage inferior list Message-ID: <20080919140712.GA31309@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200809121638.18399.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080918225118.GD1691@caradoc.them.org> <200809191459.10948.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809191459.10948.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > But I agree that this sounds somewhat bogus. It should be the > the target that should decide what to print... I'll need > to do a few further adjustments for that to be possible > though. These CLI notifications are off by default, so we > can either get rid of add_inferior_silent, or make > go32-nat.c also use it. Any preference? The attached does > the latter. This one's fine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery