From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] auxv entries
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809152022.m8FKMbbt017028@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809150920.m8F9KVTI023217@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:20:31 +0200 (CEST))
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:20:31 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>
> > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> > Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:33:04 -0300
> >
> > I have this in <elf.h> in ppc64-linux:
> >
> > typedef struct
> > {
> > uint64_t a_type; /* Entry type */
> > union
> > {
> > uint64_t a_val; /* Integer value */
> > /* We use to have pointer elements added here. We cannot do that,
> > though, since it does not work when using 32-bit definitions
> > on 64-bit platforms and vice versa. */
> > } a_un;
> > } Elf64_auxv_t;
> >
> > So default_auxv_parse seems right to me.
>
> Hmm, so it looks like Linux doesn't follow the 64-bit PowerPC ABI
> here. At least version 1.7 of that spec has the "standard" form of
> the struct with a_type being an int.
>
> OpenBSD and Solaris both use the "standard" form, so I'd argue that
> Linux is the odd one out here. I'll see if I can come up with a diff
> that overrides the standard layout for 64-bit PPC linux.
>
Here is the promised diff. Tested on Linux on amd64 (which doesn't
say a lot since it is little-endian).
ok?
Index: ChangeLog
from Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* auxv.c (default_auxv_parse): Change code to reflect standard
auxv_t layout.
* linux-nat.c (linux_nat_auxv_parse): New function.
(linux_nat_add_target): Install linux_nat_auxv_parse.
Index: auxv.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/auxv.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 auxv.c
--- auxv.c 11 Sep 2008 14:29:21 -0000 1.14
+++ auxv.c 15 Sep 2008 20:17:42 -0000
@@ -82,20 +82,22 @@ int
default_auxv_parse (struct target_ops *ops, gdb_byte **readptr,
gdb_byte *endptr, CORE_ADDR *typep, CORE_ADDR *valp)
{
- const int sizeof_auxv_field = gdbarch_ptr_bit (target_gdbarch)
- / TARGET_CHAR_BIT;
+ struct type *builtin_int = builtin_type (target_gdbarch)->builtin_int;
+ struct type *builtin_long = builtin_type (target_gdbarch)->builtin_long;
+ const int sizeof_auxv_type = TYPE_LENGTH(builtin_int);
+ const int sizeof_auxv_val = TYPE_LENGTH(builtin_long);
gdb_byte *ptr = *readptr;
if (endptr == ptr)
return 0;
- if (endptr - ptr < sizeof_auxv_field * 2)
+ if (endptr - ptr < sizeof_auxv_val * 2)
return -1;
- *typep = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_field);
- ptr += sizeof_auxv_field;
- *valp = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_field);
- ptr += sizeof_auxv_field;
+ *typep = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_type);
+ ptr += sizeof_auxv_val; /* Alignment. */
+ *valp = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_val);
+ ptr += sizeof_auxv_val;
*readptr = ptr;
return 1;
Index: linux-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/linux-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -p -r1.102 linux-nat.c
--- linux-nat.c 8 Sep 2008 21:51:18 -0000 1.102
+++ linux-nat.c 15 Sep 2008 20:17:44 -0000
@@ -4353,6 +4353,29 @@ send_sigint_callback (struct lwp_info *l
return 0;
}
+static int
+linux_nat_auxv_parse(struct target_ops *ops, gdb_byte **readptr,
+ gdb_byte *endptr, CORE_ADDR *typep, CORE_ADDR *valp)
+{
+ struct type *builtin_long = builtin_type (target_gdbarch)->builtin_long;
+ const int sizeof_auxv_field = TYPE_LENGTH(builtin_long);
+ gdb_byte *ptr = *readptr;
+
+ if (endptr == ptr)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (endptr - ptr < sizeof_auxv_field * 2)
+ return -1;
+
+ *typep = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_field);
+ ptr += sizeof_auxv_field;
+ *valp = extract_unsigned_integer (ptr, sizeof_auxv_field);
+ ptr += sizeof_auxv_field;
+
+ *readptr = ptr;
+ return 1;
+}
+
static void
linux_nat_stop (ptid_t ptid)
{
@@ -4401,6 +4424,10 @@ linux_nat_add_target (struct target_ops
t->to_terminal_inferior = linux_nat_terminal_inferior;
t->to_terminal_ours = linux_nat_terminal_ours;
+ /* The Linux folks messed up and didn't follow the ELF ABI on
+ various 64-bit architectures. */
+ t->to_auxv_parse = linux_nat_auxv_parse;
+
/* Methods for non-stop support. */
t->to_stop = linux_nat_stop;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-14 21:27 Mark Kettenis
2008-09-15 0:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-15 0:34 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-15 9:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-09-15 20:23 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2008-09-15 21:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-16 3:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-09-15 3:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809152022.m8FKMbbt017028@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox