From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10345 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2008 23:22:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 10335 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2008 23:22:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:21:23 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E851019F; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3341019D; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KdvTU-0006m4-IY; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:21:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb-freeplay Message-ID: <20080911232120.GA25741@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <48C86493.3000402@vmware.com> <20080911201701.GA13330@caradoc.them.org> <48C99BE5.3020500@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C99BE5.3020500@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:29:57PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > > It doesn't look >> like it, in which case it's probably more sensible to put it in a >> separate directory. > > Maybe -- but gdbreplay doesn't share any code with > gdbserver either. IMO, historical accident; gdbserver was smaller then :-) >> As for actually committing it, I'd request that you fix the FIXMEs >> first :-) I always hate committing code with that hanging around. > > I use fixme and to-do somewhat interchangeably. > They're not really indicative of a bug or breakage. > > I could globally replace them with TO-DO if it makes you feel better. > ;-) Not really. It's just that checked in FIXMEs rarely get fixed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery