From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13120 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2008 16:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 13110 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2008 16:35:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:34:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080DB290065; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:34:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c2l3KYQ69cr; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5335E290064; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 560) id 44BDC164B26; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:35:00 -0000 From: Jerome Guitton To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Fix testcase for SPU (Re: [RFA/testsuite] stack check) Message-ID: <20080911163439.GB35787@adacore.com> References: <20080901170203.GB226@adacore.com> <200809111626.m8BGQ4Mw020176@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809111626.m8BGQ4Mw020176@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 Ulrich Weigand (uweigand@de.ibm.com): > Jerome Guitton wrote: > > > void big_frame () > > { > > char S [524188]; > > small_frame (); > > } > > This breaks on the SPU where we only have 256 KB local store. Sorry about that. I guess that this may break other configurations; maybe we should enable this test on a limited set of targets?