From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27683 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2008 18:13:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 27672 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2008 18:13:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:22 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1839A10198; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77E110197; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KdUAs-0004Pw-Co; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:12:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [autodeps] gnu-nat, autogenerated files Message-ID: <20080910181218.GA16959@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200809091606.45512.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080910180018.GP12222@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080910180018.GP12222@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:00:18AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > This one is a little beyond my knowledge of Makefile, particularly > since the build system has changed recently. The idea seems right to me > (adding a new variable in the mh file). But I'm still wondering whether > it would be possible to use the NAT_FILE to include the list of generated > files. Tom, what do you think? Probably be a little hacky... I agree with all your comments; otherwise it seems OK to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery