From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1310 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2008 14:17:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1298 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2008 14:17:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:16:20 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m85EALgc030144; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:10:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m85EAKmN020776; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:10:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200809051410.m85EAKmN020776@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: uweigand@de.ibm.com CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com In-reply-to: <200809041928.m84JS6uq032652@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (uweigand@de.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [rfc] Displaced stepping with wrong entry point address References: <200809041928.m84JS6uq032652@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:28:06 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > > > But I guess SPU could always install its own callback to handle those > special cases ... (just as we install the ON_STACK dummy call location > method because the AT_ENTRY method doesn't work for combined applications.) Now you mention it, it would be nice if we could change the SPU code such that it doesn't use generic_push_dummy_code(). This function abuses frame_align(), and it would be nice if we could eliminate it. Something like i386_dicos_push_dummy_code() is needed. I can roll you a diff if you want, but I won't be able to test it. Thanks, Mark