From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30077 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2008 21:37:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 30065 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2008 21:37:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:36:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07399841A; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:36:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A513098418; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:36:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KbMVM-0007jh-Rp; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:36:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb_continue_to_breakpoint Message-ID: <20080904213640.GA29721@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <48C04A98.3020508@vmware.com> <20080904210357.GA27480@caradoc.them.org> <48C05279.204@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C05279.204@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:26:17PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Yabbut, this isn't a test of symbol handling, it's > a test of continuing to a breakpoint. True, though we have a lot of things that are tested 'all over' like this. >> For the second part can you just put the .* at >> appropriate callers? > > Sure, if you prefer. So maybe remove the .* but accept > the (in|at)? Yes please. That part seems fine - it's not like nothing else will break if we end up unexpectedly without debug info :-). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery