From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21018 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2008 12:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 21003 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2008 12:18:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:17:13 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8D59841B; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC58498417; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KbDlu-0007G2-UV; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:17:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Use proper extraction routine for C++ pointer-to-method types Message-ID: <20080904121710.GD27200@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200809040143.m841h9mH013010@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809040143.m841h9mH013010@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:43:09AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Any comments on this? I think this is OK - thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery