From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13981 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2008 22:12:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 13970 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2008 22:12:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:12:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D5298417; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:12:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A71981E8; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:12:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kae6X-00070b-G4; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:12:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc][00/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros Message-ID: <20080902221205.GA26925@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080902124921.GE21700@caradoc.them.org> <200809022201.m82M1t8q021067@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809022201.m82M1t8q021067@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:01:55AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > With this patch-set, I've made "expression" explicitly platform-specific, > but tried to keep "value" and "type" more platform-independent. I guess > we'll have to see if this is right choice. It makes sense to me, after some staring at it. I think the right approach is to make the common cases straightforward, and reject some of the hardest cases - for instance, I don't know that a single expression calling functions belonging to two different architectures will ever matter, in practice. [Watch the Cell debugger prove me wrong...] -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery