From: uweigand@de.ibm.com
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [rfc][10/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use expression arch for argument promotion
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080831175122.785640000@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080831175045.128504000@de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: diff-type-promote2 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 15120 bytes --]
Hello,
this patch now moves the calls to unop_promote and binop_promote up
to the respective callers. Note that a number of GDB-internal call
sites not involved with expression parsing do not need to perform
any argument promotion; they're happy with the new default behaviour
of value_binop et. al.
Note also that value_equal and value_less call value_binop; this patch
pushes the binop_promote call right through to *their* callers.
This patch adds a number of _promote calls to ada-lang.c; while these
should simply preserve the status quo, someone familiar with the Ada
type promotion rules should probably have a look at those, maybe this
code can now be simplified a bit ...
Bye,
Ulrich
ChangeLog:
* eval.c (evaluate_subexp_standard): Add calls to binop_promote
and unop_promote before calling value_binop et. al.
* ada-lang.c (ada_evaluate_subexp): Add calls to binop_promote
and unop_promote before calling value_binop et. al.
* valarith.c (value_binop): Do not call binop_promote or unop_promote.
(value_pos): Do not call unop_promote.
(value_neg, value_complement): Likewise.
Index: gdb-head/gdb/ada-lang.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-head.orig/gdb/ada-lang.c
+++ gdb-head/gdb/ada-lang.c
@@ -8521,6 +8521,7 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
type = value_type (arg1);
while (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_REF)
type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
return value_cast (type, value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_ADD));
case BINOP_SUB:
@@ -8538,6 +8539,7 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
type = value_type (arg1);
while (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_REF)
type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
return value_cast (type, value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_SUB));
case BINOP_MUL:
@@ -8555,6 +8557,7 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
arg1 = cast_from_fixed_to_double (arg1);
if (ada_is_fixed_point_type (value_type (arg2)))
arg2 = cast_from_fixed_to_double (arg2);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
return ada_value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
}
@@ -8568,7 +8571,10 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
&& (op == BINOP_DIV || op == BINOP_REM || op == BINOP_MOD))
return value_zero (value_type (arg1), not_lval);
else
- return ada_value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ {
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ return ada_value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ }
case BINOP_EQUAL:
case BINOP_NOTEQUAL:
@@ -8579,7 +8585,10 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
tem = 0;
else
- tem = ada_value_equal (arg1, arg2);
+ {
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ tem = ada_value_equal (arg1, arg2);
+ }
if (op == BINOP_NOTEQUAL)
tem = !tem;
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
@@ -8592,7 +8601,10 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
else if (ada_is_fixed_point_type (value_type (arg1)))
return value_cast (value_type (arg1), value_neg (arg1));
else
- return value_neg (arg1);
+ {
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ return value_neg (arg1);
+ }
case BINOP_LOGICAL_AND:
case BINOP_LOGICAL_OR:
@@ -8862,6 +8874,8 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
arg2 = value_from_longest (builtin_type_int, TYPE_LOW_BOUND (type));
arg3 = value_from_longest (builtin_type_int,
TYPE_HIGH_BOUND (type));
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg3);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return
value_from_longest (type,
@@ -8893,6 +8907,8 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
arg3 = ada_array_bound (arg2, tem, 1);
arg2 = ada_array_bound (arg2, tem, 0);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg3);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return
value_from_longest (type,
@@ -8909,6 +8925,8 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
goto nosideret;
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg3);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return
value_from_longest (type,
@@ -9056,8 +9074,11 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
else if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
return value_zero (value_type (arg1), not_lval);
else
- return value_binop (arg1, arg2,
- op == OP_ATR_MIN ? BINOP_MIN : BINOP_MAX);
+ {
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ return value_binop (arg1, arg2,
+ op == OP_ATR_MIN ? BINOP_MIN : BINOP_MAX);
+ }
case OP_ATR_MODULUS:
{
@@ -9115,7 +9136,16 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
else if (noside == EVAL_AVOID_SIDE_EFFECTS)
return value_zero (value_type (arg1), not_lval);
else
- return value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ {
+ /* For integer exponentiation operations,
+ only promote the first argument. */
+ if (is_integral_type (value_type (arg2)))
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ else
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+
+ return value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ }
case UNOP_PLUS:
arg1 = evaluate_subexp (NULL_TYPE, exp, pos, noside);
@@ -9128,6 +9158,7 @@ ada_evaluate_subexp (struct type *expect
arg1 = evaluate_subexp (NULL_TYPE, exp, pos, noside);
if (noside == EVAL_SKIP)
goto nosideret;
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
if (value_less (arg1, value_zero (value_type (arg1), not_lval)))
return value_neg (arg1);
else
Index: gdb-head/gdb/eval.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-head.orig/gdb/eval.c
+++ gdb-head/gdb/eval.c
@@ -1725,7 +1725,19 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
else if (op == BINOP_SUB && ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg1)))
arg2 = value_ptrsub (arg1, arg2);
else
- arg2 = value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ {
+ struct value *tmp = arg1;
+
+ /* For shift and integer exponentiation operations,
+ only promote the first argument. */
+ if ((op == BINOP_LSH || op == BINOP_RSH || op == BINOP_EXP)
+ && is_integral_type (value_type (arg2)))
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp);
+ else
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp, &arg2);
+
+ arg2 = value_binop (tmp, arg2, op);
+ }
return value_assign (arg1, arg2);
case BINOP_ADD:
@@ -1740,7 +1752,10 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
else if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg2)))
return value_ptradd (arg2, arg1);
else
- return value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ {
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ return value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ }
case BINOP_SUB:
arg1 = evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (exp, pos, noside);
@@ -1761,7 +1776,10 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
else if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg2)))
return value_ptrsub (arg2, arg1);
else
- return value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ {
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+ return value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ }
case BINOP_EXP:
case BINOP_MUL:
@@ -1798,11 +1816,22 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
struct value *v_one, *retval;
v_one = value_one (value_type (arg2), not_lval);
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &v_one);
retval = value_binop (arg1, v_one, op);
return retval;
}
else
- return value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ {
+ /* For shift and integer exponentiation operations,
+ only promote the first argument. */
+ if ((op == BINOP_LSH || op == BINOP_RSH || op == BINOP_EXP)
+ && is_integral_type (value_type (arg2)))
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ else
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
+
+ return value_binop (arg1, arg2, op);
+ }
}
case BINOP_RANGE:
@@ -2073,6 +2102,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_equal (arg1, arg2);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) tem);
@@ -2089,6 +2119,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_equal (arg1, arg2);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) ! tem);
@@ -2105,6 +2136,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_less (arg1, arg2);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) tem);
@@ -2121,6 +2153,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_less (arg2, arg1);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) tem);
@@ -2137,6 +2170,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_less (arg2, arg1) || value_equal (arg1, arg2);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) tem);
@@ -2153,6 +2187,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
}
else
{
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
tem = value_less (arg1, arg2) || value_equal (arg1, arg2);
type = language_bool_type (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch);
return value_from_longest (type, (LONGEST) tem);
@@ -2185,7 +2220,10 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (unop_user_defined_p (op, arg1))
return value_x_unop (arg1, op, noside);
else
- return value_pos (arg1);
+ {
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ return value_pos (arg1);
+ }
case UNOP_NEG:
arg1 = evaluate_subexp (NULL_TYPE, exp, pos, noside);
@@ -2194,7 +2232,10 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (unop_user_defined_p (op, arg1))
return value_x_unop (arg1, op, noside);
else
- return value_neg (arg1);
+ {
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ return value_neg (arg1);
+ }
case UNOP_COMPLEMENT:
/* C++: check for and handle destructor names. */
@@ -2206,7 +2247,10 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (unop_user_defined_p (UNOP_COMPLEMENT, arg1))
return value_x_unop (arg1, UNOP_COMPLEMENT, noside);
else
- return value_complement (arg1);
+ {
+ unop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &arg1);
+ return value_complement (arg1);
+ }
case UNOP_LOGICAL_NOT:
arg1 = evaluate_subexp (NULL_TYPE, exp, pos, noside);
@@ -2324,7 +2368,11 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg1)))
arg2 = value_ptradd (arg1, arg2);
else
- arg2 = value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ {
+ struct value *tmp = arg1;
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp, &arg2);
+ arg2 = value_binop (tmp, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ }
return value_assign (arg1, arg2);
}
@@ -2343,7 +2391,11 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg1)))
arg2 = value_ptrsub (arg1, arg2);
else
- arg2 = value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ {
+ struct value *tmp = arg1;
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp, &arg2);
+ arg2 = value_binop (tmp, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ }
return value_assign (arg1, arg2);
}
@@ -2362,7 +2414,11 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg1)))
arg2 = value_ptradd (arg1, arg2);
else
- arg2 = value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ {
+ struct value *tmp = arg1;
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp, &arg2);
+ arg2 = value_binop (tmp, arg2, BINOP_ADD);
+ }
value_assign (arg1, arg2);
return arg1;
@@ -2382,7 +2438,11 @@ evaluate_subexp_standard (struct type *e
if (ptrmath_type_p (value_type (arg1)))
arg2 = value_ptrsub (arg1, arg2);
else
- arg2 = value_binop (arg1, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ {
+ struct value *tmp = arg1;
+ binop_promote (exp->language_defn, exp->gdbarch, &tmp, &arg2);
+ arg2 = value_binop (tmp, arg2, BINOP_SUB);
+ }
value_assign (arg1, arg2);
return arg1;
Index: gdb-head/gdb/valarith.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-head.orig/gdb/valarith.c
+++ gdb-head/gdb/valarith.c
@@ -871,14 +871,6 @@ value_binop (struct value *arg1, struct
struct value *val;
struct type *type1, *type2, *result_type;
- /* For shift and integer exponentiation operations,
- only promote the first argument. */
- if ((op == BINOP_LSH || op == BINOP_RSH || op == BINOP_EXP)
- && is_integral_type (value_type (arg2)))
- unop_promote (current_language, current_gdbarch, &arg1);
- else
- binop_promote (current_language, current_gdbarch, &arg1, &arg2);
-
arg1 = coerce_ref (arg1);
arg2 = coerce_ref (arg2);
@@ -1484,8 +1476,6 @@ value_pos (struct value *arg1)
{
struct type *type;
- unop_promote (current_language, current_gdbarch, &arg1);
-
arg1 = coerce_ref (arg1);
type = check_typedef (value_type (arg1));
@@ -1509,8 +1499,6 @@ value_neg (struct value *arg1)
{
struct type *type;
- unop_promote (current_language, current_gdbarch, &arg1);
-
arg1 = coerce_ref (arg1);
type = check_typedef (value_type (arg1));
@@ -1548,8 +1536,6 @@ value_complement (struct value *arg1)
{
struct type *type;
- unop_promote (current_language, current_gdbarch, &arg1);
-
arg1 = coerce_ref (arg1);
type = check_typedef (value_type (arg1));
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-31 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 17:53 [rfc][00/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][05/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Replace LA_BOOL_TYPE macro uweigand
2008-09-05 18:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][19/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Ada range type handling uweigand
2008-09-06 0:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-07 15:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-09 18:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-09 20:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-09 22:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-09 22:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-10 6:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-10 9:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][26/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use per-frame architecture uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][13/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update EVAL_SKIP dummy return type uweigand
2008-09-05 22:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-07 15:40 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-07 15:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][15/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Dereferencing of integer types uweigand
2008-09-01 7:19 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-02 23:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-05 23:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][07/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use expression arch for size_t type uweigand
2008-09-05 18:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-05 20:16 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][09/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Make argument promotion explicit uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][29/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update valarith.c routines uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][21/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Platform-neutral builtin_type_void uweigand
2008-09-06 0:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-06 4:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-06 14:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-07 15:59 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-13 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-13 17:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][23/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Platform-neutral types for internal variables uweigand
2008-09-02 12:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 21:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-02 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 23:53 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][24/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Platform-neutral generic integers uweigand
2008-09-06 3:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-07 16:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][02/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Introduce expression architecture uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][11/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update ax-gdb expression evaluator uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][33/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Default target word size uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][01/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Unused write_exp_msymbol parameters uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][32/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update value-printing code uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][30/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Remove gdbarch_name_of_malloc uweigand
2008-08-31 17:52 ` [rfc][16/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Ada fixed/double conversions uweigand
2008-09-05 23:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][08/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Make pointer arithmetic explicit uweigand
2008-09-02 12:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 21:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-02 21:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-04 22:32 ` Tom Tromey
2008-09-05 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][04/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Introduce java_language_arch_info uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][35/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use target arch in bsd-uthread.c uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][20/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Objective-C expression evaluation uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][22/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Platform-neutral "true char" types uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][36/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use target arch in solib code uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][12/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Remove redundant coerce_enum/coerce_number uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][17/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Ada pos_atr result type uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][18/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Ada System.Address special handling uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][14/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Implicit dereferencing of references uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][03/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Extract bitstring subscript handling uweigand
2008-09-05 18:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-05 20:17 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][37/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Delete the macros uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][06/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Make OP_COMPLEX type explicit uweigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` [rfc][27/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update C++ ABI handling uweigand
2008-09-05 20:18 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 17:53 ` uweigand [this message]
2008-09-05 22:39 ` [rfc][10/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use expression arch for argument promotion Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 18:12 ` [rfc][34/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Use target arch in procfs.c uweigand
2008-08-31 18:13 ` [rfc][31/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Inferior call argument types uweigand
2008-09-06 1:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-08-31 18:15 ` [rfc][28/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update infcall.c routines uweigand
2008-09-02 12:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 21:56 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-08-31 18:16 ` [rfc][25/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros: Update *-tdep.c files uweigand
2008-08-31 22:20 ` [rfc][00/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros Mark Kettenis
2008-09-01 3:46 ` David Miller
2008-09-01 18:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-02 10:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-09-02 12:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 21:37 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-02 12:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-02 22:02 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-02 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-09-06 3:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-07 16:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-09 18:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-09 20:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-09 21:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-09 22:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-10 6:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-09-10 9:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2008-09-10 16:25 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080831175122.785640000@de.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox