From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 625 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2008 23:32:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 615 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2008 23:31:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:31:17 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B7E981E9; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:31:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4229809F; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KWJcZ-0000Kn-5s; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:31:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [rfc] add ppc testcase to test fpscr Message-ID: <20080821233115.GA1239@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches ml References: <1219360611.8989.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1219360611.8989.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:16:51PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with GDB code related to powerpc's fpscr, and noticed > that there's nothing testing it in the testsuite. This patch adds basic > sanity checking of that register. > > Also, this adds the function gdb_send_cmd to lib/gdb.exp. More than once > I've wanted to send a commad to GDB and wait to get the prompt back > (because send_gdb is too fast and can create racy testcases). This > function scratches that itch. Isn't this just the same as gdb_test "command" "" "" ? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery