From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-58119-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8796 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2008 15:03:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 8774 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2008 15:03:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:02:58 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m7KF2qMM012866; 	Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m7KF2pr2017151; 	Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:03:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200808201502.m7KF2pr2017151@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20080820144543.GA4415@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:45:43 -0400)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc-prologue.exp
References: <200808201420.m7KEKBV6028041@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080820144543.GA4415@caradoc.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:45:43 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:20:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > While running the testsuite on openbsd4.4-unknown-powerpc, I spotted
> > the following new fail:
> > 
> > +FAIL: gdb.arch/powerpc-prologue.exp: saved registers in PIC
> > 
> > The problem is that "info frame" no longer reports r31 as saved.  As
> > far as I can tell, the assembly code doesn't actually save r31, so I
> > suspect this is actually a bug in the testcase that got uncovered by
> > the following fix by Daniel:
> 
> Is your testsuite directory up to date?  I think I committed this
> testsuite fix at the same time as the patch - it's revision 1.6 of
> that file.

It is.  There are two "info frame" tests though and it looks as if you
only the second one.