From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18379 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2008 14:46:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 18151 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2008 14:46:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:45:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A675698428; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:45:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9077498427; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:45:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KVowR-0001Eh-6n; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:45:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc-prologue.exp Message-ID: <20080820144543.GA4415@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200808201420.m7KEKBV6028041@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808201420.m7KEKBV6028041@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:20:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > While running the testsuite on openbsd4.4-unknown-powerpc, I spotted > the following new fail: > > +FAIL: gdb.arch/powerpc-prologue.exp: saved registers in PIC > > The problem is that "info frame" no longer reports r31 as saved. As > far as I can tell, the assembly code doesn't actually save r31, so I > suspect this is actually a bug in the testcase that got uncovered by > the following fix by Daniel: Is your testsuite directory up to date? I think I committed this testsuite fix at the same time as the patch - it's revision 1.6 of that file. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery