From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16698 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2008 12:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16690 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2008 12:47:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:46:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 9400 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 12:46:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 12 Aug 2008 12:46:52 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI non-stop 06/11, RFA/RFC] Report non-stop availability, and allow to enable everything with one command. Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200806282054.03092.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200808121009.11540.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080812120835.GA29188@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080812120835.GA29188@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808121646.38779.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 12 August 2008 16:08:35 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:09:11AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > My motivation was that the most intuitive model is that of > > immediate application of non-stop flag, with error produced > > immediately. This is hard to implement. > > > > Next most intuitive model is "I prefer non-stop mode", which is > > what I propose. > > Actually I think this is very unintuitive. You'll have to know > whether you get non-stop or not because commands act very differently > between all-stop and non-stop. Scripts written for the one won't work > with the other, for example. Yes, you have to know whether you get non-stop or not -- does this contradict to anything I've said? - Volodya