Err, ENOPATCH.

I also forgot to mention that this also makes the case of going from:

 - -pthread or -c_r symbols not loaded

to:

 - -pthread  or -c_r symbols loaded

when the inferior is already being debugged, behave properly.  Not a usual use 
case, but previously, we were updating inferior_ptid in bsd_uthreads_wait,
but not here.

On Monday 11 August 2008 15:05:12, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Finally,
>
> Since the core_stratum layer is now registering a thread, layers above
> should claim it.  This fixes the bsd-uthread target.
>
> It is meanto to be applies on top of this one,
>  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-08/msg00295.html
>
> , although it also applies cleanly on top of the patch to make the
> bsd-uthread target always register a main thread.
>
> AIX is still needing update or just some checking, to make it always
> register a thread.  The thread syncing in aix-thread.c and its use of
> ptid_cmp still looks a bit of a mistery to me to propose a fix.  :-(
> The "failure" mode would be that you'd get two entries for the
> same thread, with different ptids.
>
> There's isn't any other target that can layer a thread_stratum
> target over a core_statum.
>
> OK, when the dependencies are in?

Here it is.

-- 
Pedro Alves