From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 679 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2008 16:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 669 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2008 16:06:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:05:03 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF87898215; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:05:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA34598200; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:05:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KSDPg-0001Xe-GX; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:05:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patches to build on DJGPP Message-ID: <20080810160500.GA5910@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200808092241.46195.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200808101536.m7AFadSV028043@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808101536.m7AFadSV028043@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:36:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Index: src/gdb/cp-name-parser.y > > =================================================================== > > --- src.orig/gdb/cp-name-parser.y 2008-08-09 20:55:32.000000000 +0100 > > +++ src/gdb/cp-name-parser.y 2008-08-09 22:27:04.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */ > > #include > > #include > > > > +#include "config.h" > > #include "safe-ctype.h" > > #include "libiberty.h" > > #include "demangle.h" > > Hmm, is there a reason not to include "defs.h" here? It's not a great reason, but yes, there is - this file is otherwise independent of GDB, because you can link it into a stand-alone test program. I won't complain if someone adds defs.h, as long as the test program still links. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery