From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29887 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2008 00:15:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29877 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2008 00:15:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:14:49 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED58498419; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:14:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2DB9813A; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:14:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KRya7-0005vZ-5L; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:14:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, John David Anglin Subject: Re: [4/7] Adjust the ttrace target (HP-UX) to always register the main thread Message-ID: <20080810001447.GB22119@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, John David Anglin References: <20080808164014.7AD9C4DCB@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <200808081822.25515.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808081822.25515.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:22:25PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Could you check this version please? Just FYI, I've completely lost track of this thread - so when there's anything you need approval for, please let me know. My understanding is that 1/7, 2/7, 7/7 are approved; 3/7 has a small discussion; 4/7 has a big discussion; and no one's looked at 5/7 or 6/7 yet. I'll look at those as soon as I get a chance, so poke me if 3/7 and 4/7 are resolved and I haven't done it yet. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery