Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, xuepeng.guo@intel.com, joey.ye@intel.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Update x86 stack align analyzer
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808091532.m79FW1gl026254@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080809145147.GA19462@lucon.org> (hjl.tools@gmail.com)

> Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 07:51:47 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> 
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > I feel, rather strongly, that the stack align stuff stuff should only
> > deal with stack alignment done *before* a frame gets setup.  I think
> > setting saved_sp_reg to -1, and proceeding as usual if it is still set
> > at that value after the stack alignment analysis, works just fine.  I
> > also noticed a problem with your diff in that it doesn't use the
> > proper saved sp value if you do have a frame (not sure GCC actually
> > generates such code).
> > 
> > How about the attached diff?  Does it work with GCC 4.4?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yes, it works.  OK to install?

Sure, but can you change the ChangeLog to use kettenis@gnu.org as my
mail-address?

> 2008-08-09  Xuepeng Guo  <xuepeng.guo@intel.com>
> 	    H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> 	    Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> 
> 	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_frame_cache): Add saved_sp_reg.
> 	(amd64_init_frame_cache): Initialize saved_sp_reg.
> 	(amd64_analyze_stack_align): New.
> 	(amd64_analyze_prologue): Call it.
> 	(amd64_frame_cache): Use saved_sp_reg if it is invalid.  Don't set
> 	%rip to 8 when halfway aligning the stack.
> 
> 	* amd64-tdep.h (amd64_regnum): Add AMD64_R9_REGNUM to
> 	AMD64_R14_REGNUM.
> 
> 	* i386-tdep.c (i386_frame_cache): Remove stack_align.  Add
> 	saved_sp_reg.
> 	(i386_alloc_frame_cache): Remove stack_align.  Initialize
> 	saved_sp_reg to -1.
> 	(i386_analyze_stack_align): Rewrite.
> 	(i386_frame_cache): Use saved_sp_reg if it is valid.


      reply	other threads:[~2008-08-09 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-30 21:12 H.J. Lu
2008-08-06 21:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-08-06 21:36   ` H.J. Lu
2008-08-09 12:03     ` Mark Kettenis
2008-08-09 14:52       ` H.J. Lu
2008-08-09 15:33         ` Mark Kettenis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808091532.m79FW1gl026254@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=joey.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=xuepeng.guo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox