From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-57807-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14782 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2008 08:34:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 14774 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2008 08:34:55 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:34:21 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m798WwPG001004; 	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:32:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m798Wvbc001860; 	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:34:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200808090832.m798Wvbc001860@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: pedro@codesourcery.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <200808080420.05897.pedro@codesourcery.com> (message from Pedro 	Alves on Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:20:04 +0100)
Subject: Re: bsd-kvm target, always a thread
References:  <200808080420.05897.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:20:04 +0100
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patches makes the bsd-kvm target register a main thread.
> 
> OK?

Hmm, it is unfortunate that a process ID of 0 is "verboten", since
that's what you are really looking at with "target kvm".  And it
should be possible for me to actually make all the running processes
visible as kernel "threads".

I guess your diff is right, although I'd prefer a less arbitrary ptid
to be used.  Would something like ptid_build(0, 1, 0) work?

> 2008-08-08  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* bsd-kvm.c: Include "gdbthread.h".
> 	(bsd_kvm_ptid): New.
> 	(bsd_kvm_open): Add a main thread.
> 	(bsd_kvm_close): Delete it.
> 	(bsd_kvm_thread_alive): New.
> 	(bsd_kvm_pid_to_str): New.
> 	(bsd_kvm_add_target): Register bsd_kvm_thread_alive and
> 	bsd_kvm_pid_to_str.